Debian slim vs alpine. See full list on turnkeylinux.
- Debian slim vs alpine. org Mar 2, 2019 · Alpine Linux is much smaller than most distribution base images (~5MB), and thus leads to much slimmer images in general. When choosing which type of Docker image to use, it’s important to consider the specific requirements of your application. Mar 7, 2023 · Slim images typically include only the necessary packages and dependencies to run the application, but may still be larger than Alpine-based images. . Dec 15, 2020 · Besides the size of the images, one key difference would be the underlying C library - Debian would be glibc and Alpine would be libmusl So advantages would be if knowing that libc is available. Jul 10, 2018 · I will perform this test using both Debian and Alpine as a base image with no other changes to the code base, app configuration, how the app is ran or the test machine. For enterprise use, in a security-critical environment, it seems necessary to use Debian packages, but it's also hard to justify such large images. Apr 11, 2024 · Comparing all the Python image sizes: - Slim tagged images are comparable in size for both Debian versions Bookworm and Bullseye but Alpine has the smallest size. Sep 19, 2023 · From what I read online, Alpine is more bleeding-edge, comparable to Arch, with community-grade packages, while Debian packages are more trustworthy. This variant is highly recommended when final image size being as small as possible is desired. See full list on turnkeylinux. rjk tfbyq gwurw gzm yak tqjgmhnx wwyvyl ncspu bvydc hji